UK case law

The Nursing and Midwifery Council v Sengu

[2017] EWHC ADMIN 2639 · High Court (Administrative Court) · 2017

Get your free legal insight →Email to a colleague
Get your free legal insight on this case →

The verbatim text of this UK judgment. Sourced directly from The National Archives Find Case Law. Not an AI summary, not a paraphrase — every word below is the original ruling, under Crown copyright and the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Full judgment

1 The applicant seeks a further extension for the interim suspension order from 13 th October for three months; that is, until 12 th January 2018. 2 The allegations arise from a referral on 15 th October 2014 from the Counter Fraud Service that she falsely represented that she had obtained academic qualifications in Zimbabwe by presenting a false certificate when applying to the University of Hertfordshire for a diploma in mental health nursing. 3 The interim suspension order was originally made on 29 th January 2015. Since then, as part of seeking to lift that interim order, she presented a further certificate that is also alleged to be false, in that it had been altered. 4 These are grave charges, and when they came before the court, and indeed before me, on 6 th April 2017, I concluded then that the importance of the risk to patients and protection of the public, as well as the gravity of the charges and confidence in the profession, outweighed any prejudice in its continuance to the respondent. The period of six months was to enable the proceedings to be concluded. The further delay has arisen in part from the difficulties in obtaining information because of the parallel criminal investigation, and, more recently, largely because of the delay in response from the respondent in providing the standard directions form, which took from January to July of this year to obtain the full information. 5 The date for hearing has now been fixed for 19 th and 20 th October 2017, and I consider, having regard to the reasons for the delay, the gravity of the allegation, the risk to patients and the importance of protection of the public and confidence in the standards of the profession outweigh any continuing prejudice to the respondent. So in those circumstances, I make the further order for an extension. I do make clear that any further extension from this court would require very specific justification to avoid continuing prejudice to the respondent. 6 I therefore order that the interim order be extended to 4 p.m. on 12 th January 2018. The respondent has permission on giving three days' written notice to the applicant to apply to the court to vary or discharge the order. There will be no order for costs.

The Nursing and Midwifery Council v Sengu [2017] EWHC ADMIN 2639 — UK case law · My AI Health